<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>faz1.com blog &#187; Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faz1.com/blog/index.php/category/data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faz1.com/blog</link>
	<description>Random thoughts by Paul Fazzone...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multi-tenant Networking Primer: needs more research</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So searchnetworking.com posted a primer on Multi-tenant networking covering the obvious approaches used today which are: physical segmentation VLANs separate vSwitches like Nexus 1000V or Open vSwitch per application or tenant Overall, I thought the article, written by Michael Brandenburg, Technical Editor, made a lot of good points and got me thinking enough to want [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distributed Virtual Switch coming to XenServer &#8211; Beta Customers Wanted!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citrix is looking for beta testers for their upcoming release of XenServer featuring a Distributed Virtual Switch (DVS). The Citrix DVS capability allows XenServer customers to centrally apply networking policy and gain visibility into VM network interfaces in a centralized manner.  It also enables the persistence of VM network policy and state through mobility events. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Stack or Enterprise Handcuffs?</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1000V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of discussion about the Enterprise Stack and if any one vendor will ever own the whole thing. While that is a grand vision for any of the companies named below (and sure to bring applause from their shareholders on &#8220;analyst&#8221; day), I simply don&#8217;t see customers ever allowing it to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XenServer on a roll!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of hub-bub made earlier this year about the fact that Red Hat was dropping Xen from RHEL 6.0 in favor of KVM and that this would ultimately lead to Xen&#8217;s demise.  You can read through the timeline of events here and details about when the drop was first spotted here. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Open vSwitch go, hurray for 1.0!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open vSwitch 1.0 was recently posted at openvswitch.org.  Check out a quick write up at virtualization.info.  And another at Infoworld. The open vSwitch development effort was brought on following the introduction of VMWare&#8217;s DVS and Cisco&#8217;s Nexus 1000V last year.  This effort brings advanced networking capabilities to hypervisor platforms like Xen, XenServer and KVM.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWorld Nicira Presentation&#8230;.NEED YOUR HELP!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 03:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am trying to get my company&#8217;s session approved for this year&#8217;s VMWorld.  When you aren&#8217;t a Platinum sponsor, it is a little bit more difficult to get these things pushed though.  So, I am asking for help from anyone who has a VMWorld account to go and vote for the session.  Many of you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s got the most servers?</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/04/18/whos-got-the-most-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/04/18/whos-got-the-most-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whose got the most dedicated servers? http://www.intac.net/a-comparison-of-dedicated-servers-by-company_2010-04-13/]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/04/18/whos-got-the-most-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waking up the bear&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/03/10/waking-up-the-bear/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/03/10/waking-up-the-bear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deployment Scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the deployment of 10G switches gains traction, the case studies, 3rd party &#8220;independent&#8221; test and rebuttals are flowing like mad.  I thought Omar Sultan from Cisco did a very good job with this one (rebuttal to a recently published Network World article) in particular in making the case that while 0-60MPH testing is certainly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/03/10/waking-up-the-bear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nexus 1000V vs. the default VMware vSwitch</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the VMware ESX vSphere 4.0 U1 update has been released, customers are moving from 3.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 at a very accelerated pace.  U1 means that the technology is stable, the kinks have been worked out and gremlins have moved on to terrorize something else.  It is also a major mental barrier [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brighttalk Virtualized Data Center Webcast &#8211; 1/21/2010</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the Brighttalk Virtualized Data Center Webcast this Thursday&#8230;.lots of good topics including mine on the Nexus 1000V! http://www.brighttalk.com/webcasts/8134/attend]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.902 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->

