<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>faz1.com blog &#187; Server Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faz1.com/blog/index.php/category/server-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faz1.com/blog</link>
	<description>Random thoughts by Paul Fazzone...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multi-tenant Networking Primer: needs more research</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So searchnetworking.com posted a primer on Multi-tenant networking covering the obvious approaches used today which are: physical segmentation VLANs separate vSwitches like Nexus 1000V or Open vSwitch per application or tenant Overall, I thought the article, written by Michael Brandenburg, Technical Editor, made a lot of good points and got me thinking enough to want [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/08/19/multi-tenant-networking-primer-needs-more-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distributed Virtual Switch coming to XenServer &#8211; Beta Customers Wanted!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citrix is looking for beta testers for their upcoming release of XenServer featuring a Distributed Virtual Switch (DVS). The Citrix DVS capability allows XenServer customers to centrally apply networking policy and gain visibility into VM network interfaces in a centralized manner.  It also enables the persistence of VM network policy and state through mobility events. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/29/distributed-virtual-switch-coming-to-xenserver-beta-customers-wanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise Stack or Enterprise Handcuffs?</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1000V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of discussion about the Enterprise Stack and if any one vendor will ever own the whole thing. While that is a grand vision for any of the companies named below (and sure to bring applause from their shareholders on &#8220;analyst&#8221; day), I simply don&#8217;t see customers ever allowing it to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/04/enterprise-stack-or-enterprise-handcuffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XenServer on a roll!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of hub-bub made earlier this year about the fact that Red Hat was dropping Xen from RHEL 6.0 in favor of KVM and that this would ultimately lead to Xen&#8217;s demise.  You can read through the timeline of events here and details about when the drop was first spotted here. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/06/02/xenserver-on-a-roll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Open vSwitch go, hurray for 1.0!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open vSwitch 1.0 was recently posted at openvswitch.org.  Check out a quick write up at virtualization.info.  And another at Infoworld. The open vSwitch development effort was brought on following the introduction of VMWare&#8217;s DVS and Cisco&#8217;s Nexus 1000V last year.  This effort brings advanced networking capabilities to hypervisor platforms like Xen, XenServer and KVM.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/18/open-vswitch-1-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWorld Nicira Presentation&#8230;.NEED YOUR HELP!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 03:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open vSwitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am trying to get my company&#8217;s session approved for this year&#8217;s VMWorld.  When you aren&#8217;t a Platinum sponsor, it is a little bit more difficult to get these things pushed though.  So, I am asking for help from anyone who has a VMWorld account to go and vote for the session.  Many of you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/05/16/vmworld-nicira-presentation-need-your-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nexus 1000V vs. the default VMware vSwitch</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the VMware ESX vSphere 4.0 U1 update has been released, customers are moving from 3.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 at a very accelerated pace.  U1 means that the technology is stable, the kinks have been worked out and gremlins have moved on to terrorize something else.  It is also a major mental barrier [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/24/nexus-1000v-vs-the-default-vmware-vswitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brighttalk Virtualized Data Center Webcast &#8211; 1/21/2010</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the Brighttalk Virtualized Data Center Webcast this Thursday&#8230;.lots of good topics including mine on the Nexus 1000V! http://www.brighttalk.com/webcasts/8134/attend]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2010/01/19/brighttalk-virtualized-data-center-webcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where did all the vSwitches go?</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/11/23/competition-i-think-it-should-be-called-complimentition/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/11/23/competition-i-think-it-should-be-called-complimentition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VN-Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been a little quiet here for the past 2 months since VMWorld in San Francisco in September. The Nexus 1000V team has been very busy this past quarter working with customer (we have added over 400 new customers in this period) and preparing for our next release which is going to post to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/11/23/competition-i-think-it-should-be-called-complimentition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the excitement for VMWorld keeps building!</title>
		<link>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/08/27/and-the-excitement-for-vmworld-keeps-building/</link>
		<comments>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/08/27/and-the-excitement-for-vmworld-keeps-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fazzone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faz1.com/blog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dull roar is starting to increase in volume and we are still 5 days from the start of VMWorld 2009 in San Francisco.  Lots of vaporware being thrown around over the past couple of days, but it is good to see the virtual network space starting to get some more attention.  For today, in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faz1.com/blog/2009/08/27/and-the-excitement-for-vmworld-keeps-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.347 seconds -->

